Home Page | Table of Contents | Previous Page | Next Page

Electronic Medical Record Keeping in the Trauma Center

Electronic Medical Record Keeping in the Trauma Center: A Timely and Cost Effective Venture
Emran R. Imami, M.D. and Joseph J. Tepas, III, M.D.
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Jacksonville

Introduction: Inadequate documentation in the acute trauma setting potentially compromises patient care, leads to lost revenue and legal liability. We therefore developed a real time database emulating an electrical medical record to obviate those problems.

Methods: Using a Windows based relational database, an application was developed to track all resuscitation at a busy adult and pediatric level I Trauma Center (TC). Injury description, admit/discharge times, attending/housestaff/nurse, procedures, disposition and complication were recorded. Nurses entered all data upon completion of the resuscitation. Data accuracy was confined with internal algorithms, routine cross-referencing with written logs and periodic attending review. Automatic procedure notes with CPT-codes were provided to billing, medical records & physicians. CQI data was regularly reviewed.

Results: Over a six month period, there were 1,329 resuscitation (1,184 adults & 145 peds). The majority of records were entered within 12 hours of resuscitation; mean entry time was 11.7 min/record. There were 754 procedures (intubation, cricothyroidotomy, needle & tube thoracostomy, DPL, vascular access, pericardiocentesis, and thoracotomy) performed generating patient charges of $271,312. System expenses included $3,000 for capital and $5,705 for labor (TC Nurses: $4,405 + Data Coordinator: $1,300). Using our established reimbursement average of 52%, this yielded a $132,377 net return for accurately and completely documented records. 374 quality concerns were identified, categorized as: Delay-145, radiology-66, Pre-Hospital-51, Triage-40, TC-36, Procedural-19 and Physician-17.

Discussion: This application provided consistent, automated documentation for TC procedures and CQI. With minimal fiscal investments, this tool was cost effective and affords additional intangible benefits of legibility, immediacy, and accountability.


Edited on December 4, 1995 / Updated on December 4, 1995
Southeastern Medical Informatics Conference / June 10, 1995
Location: http://www.med.ufl.edu/medinfo/smic95/abs22.html
Contact: Emran Imami / di.umc_8@mail.health.ufl.edu

Home Page | Table of Contents | Previous Page | Next Page